"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The reporting capabilities are very good."
"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is open source, so it is free and there are no licensing costs."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great."
Cymulate is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is ranked 7th in Penetration Testing Services with 1 review. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services writes "Open source and easy to set up". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is most compared with Rapid7 Penetration Testing Services and Cobalt.io.
See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.
We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
