We performed a comparison between Datadog and Dell CloudIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The installation step is pretty straightforward."
"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"The most valuable aspect is for us to have everything in one place."
"The network map is crucial in identifying bottlenecks and determining what needs more attention."
"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."
"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."
"Even if we don't end up using Datadog, it revealed problems and optimizations to us that weren't obvious before."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"It can be overwhelming for new people as it has a lot of features."
"It does not have the best interface."
"There is occasional UI slowness and bugs."
"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."
"Delta traces on the Golang profiler are extremely expensive concerning memory utilization."
"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."
"The dashboard could be improved. It would be helpful to get a view of specific things that we need to monitor for our application."
"We have contact with many customers that cover many areas, so we have cases where the infrastructure administration could be improved."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas Dell CloudIQ is most compared with HPE OneView, Cisco Intersight, Moogsoft, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and VirtualWisdom. See our Datadog vs. Dell CloudIQ report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.