We performed a comparison between Datadog and Tintri Global Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The installation step is pretty straightforward."
"The RUM solution has improved our ability to triage faster and hand more capabilities to our customer support."
"The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"We have found that we're able to get in and out of troubleshooting issues much more rapidly, which in turn, of course, enables us to spend more time on our products."
"The management of SLOs and their related burn-rate monitors have allowed us to onboard teams to on-call fast."
"The infrastructure monitoring capabilities are really valuable. You can just log on and see everything that is happening within an IT environment."
"The most useful feature is the APM."
"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."
"The current way accounts are billed could be vastly improved - especially when involving multiple organizations across multiple accounts in combination with reserved commitments."
"The parallel editing of the dashboards should not cause users to lose the work of another person."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Its settings should be improved for a better understanding of billing. They should also provide some alerts when there is an increase in the usage. For example, if there is 20% more increase from one week to another, the customer should get an alert."
"Additional metrics should be included."
"There is occasional UI slowness and bugs."
"The product could do better with its notifications."
"Geo-data is also something very critical that we hope to see in the future."
"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."
Earn 20 points
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Tintri Global Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Tintri Global Center [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri Global Center [EOL] writes "Provides VM protection with scheduled snapshots and replication". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas Tintri Global Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.