We performed a comparison between Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] and Symantec Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Dell Data Protection has a decent service and integrates well with users' active directories."
"The security engine is effective at catching potential threats."
"The backup speed and deduplication are the most valuable features."
"There's a really they have a really nice way to test it first. Before you adopt it. And so I would suggest trying to they they create a test site for you, and they give you a link to it, and you can basically try out all the features on your own for I think we did it for a month."
"It is a stable solution. Our company faces no problems with the backup system…The initial setup wasn't complex."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its speed, backup speed, and restore speed."
More Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] Pros →
"The solution, especially in older versions, is quite stable."
"This solution helps in that I can control quite a few computers from our central location, with ease."
"ATP is really impressive, and with EDR, it is the best solution I have ever known."
"It is easy to use. Its interface is user-friendly. So, anybody can use it very well, which is a good thing."
"The solution can scale."
"It just works. We have a console, and I can see it at a glance. I don't have any problems with it at all."
"It's good for large organizations. It's able to handle a lot of users."
"The features I find the most valuable are the protection, the encryption, and the DLP."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"I consider the product pretty expensive, so from an improvement perspective, I would like the pricing to be better."
"Whenever we talk about reporting, I have a chance to look at the reporting, and in my opinion, it's not user-friendly."
"The solution’s user interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The backup speed and deduplication are the most valuable features."
"Implementation in a beta environment is necessary before rollout to the larger community."
More Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] Cons →
"Is not a full anti-ransomware solution."
"SONAR could be improved. The false/positive rate is a little high."
"They lack the visibility you get in a heuristical, artificial, AI type of product, like a next-gen antivirus."
"We had an issue with the Broadcom migration. We had some problems with product support, and the deployment is tricky because it's an on-premises technology. Deploying any on-premises security solution is hard because you have to distribute the software."
"The reporting could be improved."
"We must have complete dissolution with advance care protection but we are finding out that we need more Symantec technical specialists. We have identified a need to hire at least one more technical specialist familiar with Symantec to improve our solutions capabilities."
"I would like to see a hybrid version of this solution that covers both in-house and cloud-based servers."
"It's not cheap."
More Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 6 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Security is ranked 5th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 139 reviews. Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Symantec Endpoint Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] writes "A highly scalable tool that ensures its users face no problems while using it as a backup system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Security writes "The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated". Dell Data Protection - Endpoint Security Suite [EOL] is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Sophos EPP Suite and Trend Micro Apex One, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Security and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.