Compare Dell EMC PowerFlex vs. NetApp HCI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell EMC PowerFlex Logo
11,393 views|8,751 comparisons
NetApp HCI Logo
10,997 views|7,151 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC PowerFlex vs. NetApp HCI and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The program is stable.""The most valuable feature of this solution is integration.""Perfectly suits customers dealing with the combination of future storage needs and, at the same time, keeping up their computing power.""The solution is quite stable.""We're doing a lot of VMware for IT so this solution is really valuable from a VMH point of view. We're trying to assist our customers mainly with management, because that's what they want. The most important aspects are ease of management, as well as ease of configuration, allowing them to attach additional nodes and resources for the applications.""The most valuable feature is high availability.""The solution was connected to alternate storage. It provides great scalability and reliability.""It is easy to use for management and operations teams because the tools are in one place."

More Dell EMC PowerFlex Pros »

"The scalability is great, because it can scale independently.""It's an all-flash solution. NetApp guarantees 3-to-1 or more than 3-to-1. It has guaranteed performance, like 15K IOPS per node.""We like SnapMirror and we've been using it for many years. We also like the object storage tools, as well as cloud sync for customers wanting to integrate between the cloud and local.""It allows me to move a VM set and require extra performance. I can easily move them onto it and have it just run.""When you are doing lifecycles for your equipment, you can just swap out pieces of equipment. We used to do one big iron to another big iron, and that's a major migration hassle. Whereas, with this environment, you can go with small nodes, one at a time, and do a refresh.""It is easy to set up, and you don't have to do much work to get it to do what it needs to do.""It has reduced our hypervisor footprint by around 20%.""The NetApp Deployment Engine that comes with it makes the actual deployment and usage very easy. That's our primary focus and it's hyper-converged. That's something that we want to use as well."

More NetApp HCI Pros »

Cons
"I am not really impressed by the technical support of this solution.""There should be more functionality available for routing.""Including instrumentation would be a helpful improvement.""The solution needs to offer more documentation and educational materials.""I think there might be some room for improvement when it comes to pricing, because although I know how to convert customers, at the end of day, it's quite expensive. Sometimes your feature architecture is still coming out much cheaper than hardware costs for your infrastructure.""I would like to see a more user-friendly interface.""The biggest issue with the solution is that it doesn't support Hyper V. It's a big problem.""The installation is complex."

More Dell EMC PowerFlex Cons »

"In the next version I would like to see bigger GPU types and insurance for including transparency.""The price should be lowered. It's a little expensive.""It would be great if they took something like kernel storage and integrated straight into the NetApp as well.""Because I like block mode, I'd like to see SAN connectivity. I would like to be able to easily put it into my current environment.""There have been some drive type of issues where we have to apply a new code level. Storage nodes kick certain drives until they act as though they have failed when really they haven't. You just have to reinsert them, then they go on about their happy way. It's sort of a bug.""I would like to see a better upgrade process, like the one that ONTAP has.""HCI has not enabled us to consolidate workloads or break down silos and has not increased application performance. It has also not resulted in more efficient use of compute resources.""The deployment process has room for improvement. I would like for it to be a cookie-cutter deployment."

More NetApp HCI Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing for this solution is good.""The price of the solution is fair, it is priced in the average range amongst competitors."

More Dell EMC PowerFlex Pricing and Cost Advice »

"All the licenses are included when you buy the program.""You still have to pay for the licensing for VMware and Red Hat licenses separately. It's not all inclusive at this point.""This solution reduced our maintenance costs. We were going to have to pay one to two million dollars to put in compute nodes. We are avoiding those costs.""Licenses run on a yearly basis, and there aren't any additional fees other than the standard licensing fee.""The licensing fees are renewed annually."

More NetApp HCI Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hyper-Converged (HCI) solutions are best for your needs.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  It is easy to use for management and operations teams because the tools are in one place.
Top Answer: The price of the solution is fair, it is priced in the average range amongst competitors.
Top Answer: When checking some of the components in the RCM during upgrades, it can be difficult, you have to check and upgrade the software-defined storage because it will get out of scale with the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
10th
Views
11,393
Comparisons
8,751
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
333
Rating
8.1
7th
Views
10,997
Comparisons
7,151
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
745
Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VxFlex, VxRack FLEX, PowerFlex
Learn More
Overview

VxRack System consists of hyper-converged rack-scale engineered systems, with integrated networking, to achieve the scalability and management requirements of traditional and cloud native workloads. The VxRack series is purposely designed to enable customers to quickly deploy Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) and/or Private Cloud architectures. VxRack Systems tightly integrate hardware with software and management layers.

The result is a fully tested, pre-configured, hyper-converged system with simplified operations at data center and Service Provider scale. VxRack Systems support the deployment of a variety of application workloads, allowing IT to rapidly deliver new services while improving overall agility and efficiency.

NetApp HCI is the only true enterprise-scale hyper converged cloud infrastructure. NetApp HCI comes in a 2 RU chassis with 4 node expansion slots.

Offer
Learn more about Dell EMC PowerFlex
Learn more about NetApp HCI
Sample Customers
Canopy, 8x8Inc., Atos, Canadian Pacific, City of Denton, CenturyLink, BNP Paribas, Asyaport, EDF, CSC, Fox Sports, Insight, Hunter, KPIT, Paetec, Rosetta Stone, Sonda, Xerox
American Showa, Children's Mercy, Coca-Cola, Consultel Cloud, Evangelische Landeskirche in Wurttemberg, Imperva, Surface Mount Technology
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company5%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company18%
Financial Services Firm12%
Pharma/Biotech Company12%
Manufacturing Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise42%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC PowerFlex vs. NetApp HCI and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Dell EMC PowerFlex is ranked 10th in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 8 reviews while NetApp HCI is ranked 7th in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 22 reviews. Dell EMC PowerFlex is rated 8.2, while NetApp HCI is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dell EMC PowerFlex writes "Enables users to attach additional nodes and resources for the applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp HCI writes "A strong and efficient product that can scale storage and compute independently". Dell EMC PowerFlex is most compared with VxRail, VMware vSAN, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series and HPE SimpliVity, whereas NetApp HCI is most compared with Nutanix Acropolis AOS, VMware vSAN, VxRail, HPE Nimble Storage dHCI and StarWind Virtual SAN. See our Dell EMC PowerFlex vs. NetApp HCI report.

See our list of best Hyper-Converged (HCI) vendors.

We monitor all Hyper-Converged (HCI) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.