Elastic Observability vs Prometheus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
12,565 views|10,451 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Prometheus Logo
6,474 views|5,765 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 28, 2023

We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and Prometheus based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Elastic Observability's complexity varies depending on the environment, while Prometheus has a simple basic setup but customization takes more time.
  • Features: Elastic Observability offers options for machine learning and custom development, while Prometheus has a fast data storage system and valuable scraping mechanism. Both tools have flexible integration capabilities and reliable solutions, but differ in their unique features.
  • Pricing: Elastic Observability's setup cost can range from $5,000 to $12,500 per node annually and varies based on usage and licensing. Additional paid features are also available. Prometheus, on the other hand, is free and open source, making it an attractive and affordable option.
  • Service and Support: Elastic Observability has excellent customer support with a dedicated resource, and a helpful online community. In contrast, Prometheus has no technical support and relies solely on documentation and community support.
  • ROI: Elastic Observability provides cost-effective solutions that offer complete visibility and the ability to quickly identify root causes. On the other hand, Prometheus is a free tool that offers a valuable ROI.

Comparison Results: Elastic Observability offers comprehensive features, machine learning capabilities, and can handle custom development. In contrast, Prometheus lacks user-friendly query language, visualization tools, and customer support, even though it is flexible and has integration capabilities. Elastic Observability is cost-effective and has helped reduce incidents and overheads, while Prometheus is free but lacks some essential features. Ultimately, Elastic Observability is a more complete and economical option for application performance monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Prometheus Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The architecture and system's stability are simple.""Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds.""The solution allows us to dig deep into data.""For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool .""The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization.""It's easy to deploy, and it's very flexible.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search.""The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

More Elastic Observability Pros →

"Prometheus is a great solution for monitoring.""It has lots of APIs and libraries to integrate with any kind of language.""The solution offers an easy way to install and scratch values.""The product’s scalability is valuable.""Prometheus gives us high availability automatically.""It is an efficient solution.""The product is easy to maintain.""The most valuable features of Prometheus are the many functions available. The functions are helpful for understanding the behavior of applications and infrastructure."

More Prometheus Pros →

Cons
"Elastic Observability’s price could be improved.""More web features could be added to the product.""There could be more low-code features included in the product.""There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities.""The cost must be made more transparent.""In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana.""They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base.""Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

More Elastic Observability Cons →

"Prometheus can definitely improve its visualization. For example, the matrices represented in Prometheus do not have a very good visualization on their dashboard.""The query language in Prometheus is an area of concern where improvements are required.""If you want to collect details of metrics, you should be able to write a query for it directly. I want the product to offer better queries for the metrics.""The product must improve its documentation.""The setup process could be more straightforward.""Setting up the rules in Prometheus can be confusing, making it an area where improvements are required.""One potential area for improvement would be fixing the occasional glitches and bugs.""The solution's error handling part could be improved."

More Prometheus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
  • "There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
  • "Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
  • "The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."
  • "Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."
  • "One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
  • "Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
  • "We will buy a premium license after POC."
  • More Elastic Observability Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Prometheus is good, it is affordable because it is open source and there is no cost to it. You put it on your own server and the costs incurred completely depend on how you set it up."
  • "This is an open-source solution."
  • "The solution is not expensive."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "The solution is free of cost."
  • "We use the solution's open-source version."
  • "The tool is open-sourced."
  • "We have the open-source version, so we don't pay for it."
  • More Prometheus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
    Top Answer:The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Prometheus is its ability to collect metrics.
    Top Answer:For a project I am currently working on in my company, I use Grafana, but for the data source part, I use Prometheus. I use Prometheus in a Kubernetes cluster. I use Prometheus for the processes… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    12,565
    Comparisons
    10,451
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    445
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    6,474
    Comparisons
    5,765
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    387
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    To effectively monitor and gain insights across your distributed systems, you need to have all your observability data in one stack. Break down silos by bringing together application, infrastructure, and user data into a unified solution for end-to-end observability and alerting.
    Rely on the most widely deployed observability platform available, built on the proven Elastic Stack (also known as the ELK Stack) to converge silos, delivering unified visibility and actionable insights.

    Prometheus is a powerful open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit designed for cloud-native environments. 

    It collects metrics from various sources, including applications, services, and infrastructure components, providing real-time insights into system performance. 

    With its flexible data model and query language, Prometheus enables users to analyze and visualize metrics, facilitating troubleshooting and capacity planning. Its robust alerting system allows for proactive monitoring, notifying users of any anomalies or issues. 

    Prometheus also offers seamless integration with popular tools and frameworks, making it a versatile solution for monitoring and observability.

    Sample Customers
    PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Retailer13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Elastic Observability vs. Prometheus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Prometheus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews while Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews. Elastic Observability is rated 7.8, while Prometheus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Datadog and Azure Monitor, whereas Prometheus is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry and AWS X-Ray. See our Elastic Observability vs. Prometheus report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.