We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Security is that you can install agents, and they are not separately licensed."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."
"It's not very complicated to install Elastic."
"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."
"The scalability is good. It can be scaled easily in the production environment."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the prevention methods and the incident alerts."
"I like the indexing of the logs."
"ELK documentation is very good, so never needed to contact technical support."
"The policies are easy to make and controlled by the Kaspersky Administrative Security Center, which comes at no additional costs."
"I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy."
"We use the solution for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business's most valuable feature is the ease of management."
"The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data."
"I think that all the features are valuable for our environment."
"They have a very good reporting system and they have a very good dashboard for the administrator, which makes monitoring everything easy."
"The signature update is done securely."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution is not stable."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."
"We'd like better premium support."
"Email notification should be done the same way as Logentries does it."
"The tool should improve its scalability."
"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."
"We'd like to see some more artificial intelligence capabilities."
"Elastic has one problem. In the past, Elastic Security was free. Now, they currently only offer the basic license or a certain period of time."
"The solution could offer better reporting features."
"We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release."
"This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control."
"It would be ideal with the solution offered more documentation."
"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
"Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license."
"The GUI of the product is too basic, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors."
"From time to time, some users loose connection via the Network Agent."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 16th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 58 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 10th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 110 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. See our Elastic Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.