OpenText InfoArchive vs SourceOne [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
788 views|327 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText InfoArchive and SourceOne [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use SourceOne [EOL]?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:It has a strong XML engine for reading data and making it indexed and searchable.
Top Answer:Something can be improved with every product. They can continue to grow the solution to scale it and make it easier to configure. It requires a decent amount of XL mapping. They should also have more… more »
Top Answer:The two main use cases are for sunsetting applications and keeping data when you don't want to pay the full licensing costs for the application. For example, for archival purposes, you may need to… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
788
Comparisons
327
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In File Archiving
Comparisons
Also Known As
SourceOne
Learn More
Overview

OpenText InfoArchive is a modern archive solution and cloud-based service for compliant archiving of both structured and unstructured information highly-accessible, scalable and economical.

SourceOne for File Systems enables full text or primary metadata only indexing. With an Index in Place feature, it delivers the value of indexing and search to all files regardless of location. File system data can be placed on multiple target locations. Based on the location, data can be disposed of independently over time. NAS source data can be copied or moved to the SourceOne Archive, or tiered to one or multiple target devices.
Sample Customers
BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health
AHRC New York City
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer13%
Financial Services Firm12%
Computer Software Company10%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText InfoArchive is ranked 4th in File Archiving with 1 review while SourceOne [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in File Archiving. OpenText InfoArchive is rated 0.0, while SourceOne [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText InfoArchive writes "A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data". On the other hand, OpenText InfoArchive is most compared with IBM Integrated Archive Platform, whereas SourceOne [EOL] is most compared with MessageSolution Enterprise Archiver.

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.