Compare Entrust TransactionGuard vs. IBM Safer Payments

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
101
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
756
Comparisons
548
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
TransactionGuard
Learn
Entrust Datacard
IBM
Overview

Provides real-time monitoring of transactions, automatic detection of fraudulent activities and comprehensive case management tools.

Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.

Offer
Learn more about Entrust TransactionGuard
Learn more about IBM Safer Payments
Sample Customers
Banco Security, IndianMusicInfo.com, Oakland County Michigan, SILA CommunicationsBorgun
Entrust TransactionGuard is ranked 25th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while IBM Safer Payments is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Entrust TransactionGuard is rated 0.0, while IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Entrust TransactionGuard is most compared with , whereas IBM Safer Payments is most compared with SAS Fraud Management, IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and SecureBank.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.