Epicor Vista [EOL] vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Epicor Logo
views| comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,174 views|917 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Epicor Vista [EOL] and Microsoft Dynamics GP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."
  • "​We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."
  • "For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."
  • "The solution's price is steep."
  • "I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."
  • "I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."
  • "In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."
  • "It is an affordable solution."
  • More Microsoft Dynamics GP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.
    Top Answer:The approximate cost of Dynamics GP can vary depending on factors like the number of users, additional modules, and infrastructure requirements. On average, it may cost around $50,000 per year for a… more »
    Top Answer:Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization. As a legacy application, it is not on par with newer ERP systems like Dynamics 365 or SAP. Microsoft's plans to end support… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In ERP
    13th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    1,174
    Comparisons
    917
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    436
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Vista
    Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Epicor Vista is a world-class, integrated manufacturing and accounting solution for emerging manufacturers, job shops or make-to-order departments of large enterprises. Vista employs an intuitive user interface with tree navigation, grid entry, drill down capabilities and icons for point and click simplicity.

    Vista is loaded with innovative tools that will help you take control of estimating, orders, scheduling, costing, inventory, quality and much more. It also has the power to assist key business initiatives such as lean manufacturing and quality performance management.

    Epicor Vista is a next-generation manufacturing and accounting solution based on the Microsoft .NET Framework and using a true service-oriented architecture (SOA). Vista, as the emerging market version of Epicor Vantage, achieves unparalleled flexibility. You have access to the information you want, in the format you want, when you want it, to make informed business decisions. As your business grows, the system will adapt to both planned and unplanned changes in your business and is a tool to help you rapidly employ new business strategies.

    Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft
    Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government20%
    Retailer20%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Construction Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Epicor Vista [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ERP while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 13th in ERP with 22 reviews. Epicor Vista [EOL] is rated 1.0, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Epicor Vista [EOL] writes "If you do not setup the correct printer path every day, it will crash. I have to use many tools to add a product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "A user-friendly solution for accounting and sales purchase model with all options in one frame". Epicor Vista [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics AX, Oracle E-Business Suite, Epicor ERP, SAP ERP and SAP S/4HANA.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.