We performed a comparison between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics SL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"The initial setup is easy."
"LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"It's pretty easy to set up."
"If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"When it comes to planning, it's more challenging to consider the entire structure, such as having a specific SKU and wanting to look at the planning for the whole structure. You must delve into individual item details to plan for it with order planning. Therefore, improvements will allow more comprehensive planning for each SKU."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"The licensing of the solution should be adjusted. The policies aren't ideal. They should make it easier to understand. Right now, it's too confusing."
"An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics SL is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Dynamics SL is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics SL writes "Simplify and streamline complex business processes, and good integration capabilities but lacks predictive capabilities". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and SAP S/4HANA, whereas Microsoft Dynamics SL is most compared with .
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
