Compare ESET Dynamic Threat Defense vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM)

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is ranked 11th in Advanced Threat Protection with 1 review while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is ranked 6th in Advanced Threat Protection with 10 reviews. ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is rated 9.0, while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ESET Dynamic Threat Defense writes "Good pricing, an easy installation process and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) writes "Good support, powerful decoders and concentrator, but the dashboard is not reflecting events in real-time ". ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is most compared with FortiEDR, whereas RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is most compared with IBM QRadar, Splunk and ArcSight.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use ESET Dynamic Threat Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap.

Read more »

Performance and reporting are very good.The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use.The most valuable feature is that we can create our own connectors for any application, and NetWitness provides the training and tools to do it.The most valuable features are the packet decoder, log decoder, and concentrator.It's fully scalable. There is no limit. Of course, the license limits per day the number of terabytes. In my opinion, it's very flexible.The most valuable feature is the ability to write rules and triggers for network communication, and then being able to investigate based on that.The most valuable features are its ingestion of logs and raising of alerts based on those logs.Their technical support responds quickly and are knowledgable.

Read more »

Cons
The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product.

Read more »

The user interface is a little bit difficult for new users and it needs to be improved.The documentation is not as structured as I would like, personally, and I think that it can be improved and made much more user-friendly.The initial setup is very complex and should be simplified.Log aggregation is an issue with this solution because there are a huge number of alerts in a single instance.They should implement algorithms to digest that data and produce additional, more advanced reporting, alerting and support of internal security teams.The system looks like it is a mix of a bunch of different systems, and nothing looked like it was quite together.I'd like to see improvement in its ease of use. It's basically unusable. It's overly complex.The initial setup was complex because it takes a lot of time to complete the implementation.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day.We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment.This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap.The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive.It is cheap.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
149
Comparisons
46
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
6,846
Comparisons
4,503
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
474
Avg. Rating
6.8
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
RSA Security Analytics
Learn
ESET
RSA
Overview

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense provides another layer of security for ESET products like Mail Security and endpoint products by utilizing a cloud-based sandboxing technology to detect new, never before seen types of threats.

If you’re relying on log data to detect and prevent cyber threats, you’re in trouble. Attackers increasingly evade detection of log-centric security and network monitoring tools. But logs combined with full packet, endpoint NetFlow data are proven to provide the essential details for early threat detection. Here’s a closer look at our solution.

Offer
Learn more about ESET Dynamic Threat Defense
Learn more about RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM)
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Los Angeles World Airports, Reply
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.