Compare Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior.""Timeline based analysis; good platform support""The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it.""I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful.""The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good.""It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pros »

"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work.""The pricing is very good.""The automation is excellent.""The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros »

Cons
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product.""The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate""We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with.""They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however.""Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful.""We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Cons »

"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added.""The user interface could be a bit better.""When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot.""There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products.""There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology.
Top Answer: I've examined the cost and have found it to be rather reasonable. It's not overly expensive for what it offers.
Top Answer: We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment.
Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: The licensing is paid on a yearly basis. It is quite expensive. When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot.
Ranking
Views
8,619
Comparisons
6,008
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
469
Rating
7.8
Views
10,758
Comparisons
8,583
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
459
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

Exabeam Fusion SIEM is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Offer
Learn more about Exabeam Fusion SIEM
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Sample Customers
Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise22%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Exabeam Fusion SIEM is ranked 4th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 6 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 5 reviews. Exabeam Fusion SIEM is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Exabeam Fusion SIEM writes "Good at security logging in our infrastructure but be prepared for problems if you start with a large implementation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". Exabeam Fusion SIEM is most compared with Splunk, Securonix Security Analytics, IBM QRadar, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Sumo Logic, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, ServiceNow Security Operations and SECDO Platform. See our Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.