We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Logpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."
"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."
"The product is easy to use."
"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."
"We like the user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA) and find it valuable."
"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."
"The most beneficial was being able to prove, with proper reports, that from a compliance perspective, the company is in control. The service part of LogPoint did modifications or did some additional work to have the proper reports defined."
"The search feature is valuable. The dashboards are also valuable for our bosses. Another valuable feature, which is the main feature of the product, is the centralization of all the logs."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."
"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."
"Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"We were missing visuals and graphics. Recently, a new version seems to have come out, and it has a new graphical user interface. When I was integrating it, it was usable, but the GUI needed improvement."
"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."
"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."
"Logpoint is not flexible. Its documentation is not user-friendly."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Logpoint is ranked 29th in Log Management with 20 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.