Compare FatPipe SD-WAN vs. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Barracuda Networks and others in SD-WAN. Updated: September 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The big advantage of this solution is that we can select the right model for our requirements, which is not too expensive.""I believe the licensing fee is for one year, three years, and five years, or something like that. If you wants to increase the support level from a simpler level to platinum, I think that there's a cost. There are differences between every kind of support, but I don't know the numbers.""We would love to take other solution from Forcepoint, but unfortunately the price is too high. That's why we are not considering using Forcepoing for our proxy and DLB. They have a very good DLB, but the matter in the end is the cost.""Forcepoint is very expensive but it's really secure.""It is expensive.""The training that they offer to their end-customers. It's quite expensive, I believe it costs roughly $11,000"

More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SD-WAN solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the console management.
Top Answer: We paid for a subscription license, vendor support, and the training.
Top Answer: The interface is not user-friendly. We were told that we would receive training but it came late and we had already started to deal with the product, which ultimately caused problems because we did it… more »
Ranking
19th
out of 28 in SD-WAN
Views
176
Comparisons
140
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
out of 28 in SD-WAN
Views
4,082
Comparisons
3,097
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
461
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 78% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
FatPipe Symphony, Symphony, FatPipe Symphony SD-WAN, Symphony SD-WANForcepoint NGFW, Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall, McAfee Network Security Platform, Intel Security Network Security Platform
Learn
FatPipe Networks
Forcepoint
Overview

Symphony is one of the FatPipe’s products which are offering Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN) solution. This SD-WAN solution simplifies the deployment and management of connectivity at remote sites. More over enterprises deploying Symphony with Orchestrator are not only provided with the ability to centrally control their WANs but also to manage branch office configuration. The appliances can be deployed with zero-touch installation as well.

Forcepoint Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall protects enterprise networks with high-performance "intelligence aware" security supported by real-time updates. This enables Stonesoft to deliver the industry's best defense against advanced evasions, alone with complete next-generation firewall protection when and where you need it - at remote sites, branch offices, data centers, and the network edge.
Offer
Learn more about FatPipe SD-WAN
Learn more about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider29%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company10%
Transportation Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Barracuda Networks and others in SD-WAN. Updated: September 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 19th in SD-WAN while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is ranked 4th in SD-WAN with 13 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 0.0, while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall writes "Good console management, but the interface is not user-friendly and application filtering needs finer granularity". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VeloCloud and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall and Darktrace.

See our list of best SD-WAN vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

We monitor all SD-WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.