We performed a comparison between FatPipe SD-WAN and Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"The simplicity of the solution is its most valuable asset. It's very user-friendly."
"Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is very simple, easy to use, and flexible."
"The blocking, based on the signal provided, is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"I found the initial setup process to be very simple and straightforward."
"Technical support has been quite helpful in the past."
"Next Generation Firewall's best feature is that it can be managed on one platform."
"The most valuable feature is controlling the traffic and the logging. They have real-time logins for traffic logs. Troubleshooting was very easy for me."
"We like the scalability of Forcepoint because with the Forcepoint NGFW solution, we can scale anything. The solution has central management, so we can manage all the branches and devices centrally in one controller."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"They need to work on stability, it has not been the best in our experience."
"If I want to allow access to Facebook, yet not allow the user to access videos, then I am not able to do it with this product."
"They should provide more details on potential cyber threats."
"It's a complicated firewall. Until you come to know the firewall inducers, most people don't like the firewall because the components for the firewall are a little bit complex. User-friendliness is a little bit tough. It needs to be user-friendly when creating policies, and pushing policies. Committing takes more time compared to Palo Alto."
"Configuration is not easy because it has an old-fashioned interface. The configuration interface is highly complex, and it's been the same for years. They have to change the interface."
"The initial setup of the Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has areas that are difficult."
"The security features need to be improved."
"Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall could change its interface, allowing standard or direct connect modes to be configured."
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is ranked 13th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 40 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall writes "Good URL filtering with helpful technical support and good scalability". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Check Point NGFW, Cisco Secure Firewall and Sophos XG.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
