We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
Earn 20 points
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 5th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with ThreatMetrix, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform, BioCatch and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.