Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pros →

"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services.""The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us.""The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement.""Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA.""Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pros →

Cons
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Cons →

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction.""The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated.""RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow.""I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages...""Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further.""It has taken years to implement."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
  • More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
  • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions.
    Top Answer:The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair.
    Top Answer:The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,045
    Comparisons
    619
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    813
    Rating
    9.0
    25th
    Views
    329
    Comparisons
    280
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine is the smartest technological approach to fraud management, developed to cope with the constant threat of new fraud attacks, while enabling businesses to accept their genuine customers – on premise or via secure cloud.

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine (Adaptive, Real-time, Individual, Change Identification) is a real-time, machine learning, fraud management software platform for organisations in financial services, insurance and gaming.

    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm49%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 5th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with ThreatMetrix, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform, BioCatch and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.