We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the OTP on the mobile phone."
"The feature I value the most is the one-time passwords because it helps to authenticate users so you know the timing of their usage."
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"The solution could be more automated. It should be able to let me automate a lot of things so that what normally is done as a matter of manual processes can be handled quicker. Slow integrations can be taken up/out if there was more automation."
"The product must provide full support for third-party FIDO security keys."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"Integration with FortiGate could be more fluid."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"It has taken years to implement."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
