We performed a comparison between Fischer Identity Governance and RSA Aveksa [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM).Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
Fischer Identity Governance is ranked 43rd in Identity Management (IM) while RSA Aveksa [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Identity Management (IM). Fischer Identity Governance is rated 6.0, while RSA Aveksa [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fischer Identity Governance writes "Initial setup was a bit complex because we needed to implement lots of workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Aveksa [EOL] writes "The most valuable features are the identity store and the membership rules". Fischer Identity Governance is most compared with , whereas RSA Aveksa [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.