Forter vs Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Forter Logo
1,598 views|524 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forter and Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
1,598
Comparisons
524
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Forter provides instant, guaranteed approve/decline decisions for every transaction, removing the burden and uncertainty of fraud.

The system is designed to treat all orders as “innocent unless proven guilty” to ensure high approval rates and frictionless checkout. Since Forter only charges for approved transactions, our interests are always aligned with yours. Moreover, our confidence in the system’s accuracy means we do not hesitate to offer a full fraud chargeback guarantee.

Oracle Adaptive Access Manager helps organizations prevent fraud and misuse by strengthening existing authentication flows, evaluating the risk of events as they happen and providing risk-based interdiction mechanisms such as multi-factor out-of-band authentication. Intuitive policy administration and standardized integrations with the Identity and Access Management Suite components makes Oracle Adaptive Access Manager uniquely flexible and effective at reducing an enterprise's security exposure. Oracle Adaptive Access Manager provides real-time and batch risk analytics to combat fraud and misuse across multiple channels of access. It automates reviews of access and transaction events to detect fraud and misuse resulting in saved time and money, a proven capabilities and quick return on investment.
Sample Customers
Kiwi.com, Fiverr, James Allen
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Sudhir Power Ltd., Joyo Bank Ltd., Boxfusion, Mitsubishi Corporation, Saga d.o.o. Beograd, Asia Commercial Bank, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Yapi Kredi Bank, Overhead Door Corporation, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer15%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise73%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Forter is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Forter is rated 9.0, while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, Forter is most compared with Riskified, Signifyd, Sift Digital Trust and Safety, Kount and ThreatMetrix, whereas Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.