We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Fortinet FortiADC vs. Loadbalancer.org

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiADC vs. Loadbalancer.org and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"TSL and SSL offloading are both very good features.""The most valuable feature is its simplicity.""Content caching and content compression are good features.""Simple to use and easy to integrate.""The most valuable feature is the SSL offloading capacity."

More Fortinet FortiADC Pros »

"It helps us to route the traffic to the available servers. If we didn't have Loadbalancer we would fail to set the end-user and it would cause a failure in the cluster.""For now, it's stable."

More Loadbalancer.org Pros »

Cons
"FortiADC is complex to configure so the interface should be improved.""It would be good if they built in a fully functional web application firewall.""Technical support and documentation could both be improved.""Issues with SSL and encrypted traffic.""The initial setup could be simplified."

More Fortinet FortiADC Cons »

"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience.""It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."

More Loadbalancer.org Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
Top Answer: Simple to use and easy to integrate.
Top Answer: From a pricing perspective, I believe FortiADC is cheaper than the F5 and also cheaper than some of the well established load balancers. There is a subscription fee but I'm not sure of the exact cost.
Top Answer: It doesn't have the bonding capability feature. I would like to see the bonding capability feature included and it should be easier to upgrade. The capacity that we currently have is 2G. If we could… more »
Top Answer: We are using this solution for internet management. We have approximately eight incoming ISP lines. All of the ISP lines go to the load balancer. We use it for normal internet access.
Ranking
Views
6,651
Comparisons
5,448
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.5
Views
1,805
Comparisons
1,376
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
312
Rating
7.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
FortiADC Application Delivery Controller, FortiADC
Learn More
Loadbalancer.org
Video Not Available
Overview

With bandwidth demand growing faster than budgets and cyber attacks constantly on the rise, it can be challenging to securely and efficiently deliver applications at the speed your users expect. Fortinet ADC appliances optimize the availability, user experience, and scalability of enterprise application delivery. They deliver fast, secure, and intelligent acceleration and distribution of even the most demanding enterprise applications.

Loadbalancer.org leads the market in delivering high-performance load balancers and load balancing solutions to customers around the world. Customers who depend on the high-availability of business critical applications can take advantage of unparalleled versatility, affordable costs and instant access to the industry’s most responsive 24/7 support – even during a free trial. Founded in 2002, Loadbalancer.org has offices in the USA, Canada, Germany and headquarters in the UK. With thousands of physical, virtual & cloud-based appliances deployed across six continents, Loadbalancer.org ensures the uptime of e-commerce websites & mission critical applications globally, whilst also improving performance, security, scalability and providing a rapid return on investment (ROI). Loadbalancer.org offers a no-nonsense approach and complete focus on load balancing.

Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiADC
Learn more about Loadbalancer.org
Sample Customers
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company28%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company4%
REVIEWERS
Government38%
Healthcare Company13%
Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government10%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise55%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiADC vs. Loadbalancer.org and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiADC is ranked 6th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews while Loadbalancer.org is ranked 14th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 2 reviews. Fortinet FortiADC is rated 7.6, while Loadbalancer.org is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiADC writes "Great inbuilt firewall feature; content compression is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Stable internet management and access but the scalability needs improvement". Fortinet FortiADC is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster and NGINX Plus, whereas Loadbalancer.org is most compared with HAProxy, Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and NGINX Plus. See our Fortinet FortiADC vs. Loadbalancer.org report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.