We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten since, in our company, we have never experienced the solution crashing or having any other issues."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is the capturing of traffic for reports."
"Overall we are satisfied with all the features the solution provides."
"The anti-virus protection it offers our clients is solid."
"It's easy to set up the product."
"The solution provides good standardized reports and is easy to troubleshoot."
"The ability to gather all gateway information and logs in a single location is the most valuable feature."
"The features that our customers have found most valuable are their different type of reports including the drill down report, as well as the flexibility to connect to any number of appliances which can be connected to it centrally."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"Technical support could respond to queries faster."
"They can include integration with devices, such as firewalls, endpoints, from other vendors. They can include graphic monitoring of everything in the network, not just Fortinet products. It would also be good to include customizable reports and customizable views of the reports."
"The user interface could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The technical support is not very good."
"Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is not in the cloud environment like some of the other products. There could be a possibility of extending its functionality to the cloud environment. If possible, they could have a deal with or integrate with other firewall manufacturers, like Palo Alto and Cisco, and mix the information. It is a difficult functionality. I don't know if any product in the market provides such functionality."
"It should have customized reports as well. While it currently has them, you need to write a script which is not straightforward."
"In terms of what could be improved, sometimes it's lagging and it also has some graphical issues with the GUI."
"The setup of the solution can be improved because it is currently complex."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is ranked 8th in Log Management with 81 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer writes "We can automate event-based handling solutions, is stable, and is great for heavy traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.