We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Logging is the best feature."
"We like the fact that we can run minute-by-minute reporting form this solution."
"It has a simplified and user-friendly interface."
"FortiAnalyzer's reporting features like graphs, threat intelligence, and vulnerabilities analysis are helpful. Fortinet knows how to do reporting. You can customize your reports to show exactly what you want to analyze. It's user-friendly and doesn't require a lot of effort."
"FortiAnalyzer has a user-friendly interface with a quick response and good analytics. It's very secure because it's taking the log from the devices on a secure channel, so there is no problem with that in your network."
"The solution is quite easy to deploy."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution provides good standardized reports and is easy to troubleshoot."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The pricing could be better. They could work to make it more competitive on the market."
"They could always improve the interface and the user experience."
"The user interface could be a bit more user-friendly."
"Our organization wants the solution to be able to provide us access to a centralized dashboard that displays a log view for all firewalls under Fortinet FortiAnalyzer."
"Fortinet FortiAnalyzer should come bundled with other Fortinet solutions. Additionally, the performance and updates could improve. They need to test their updates better so there are not as many bugs."
"We are concerned about the compliance of our policy and institutional philosophy."
"It's possible that they could add some advanced analytics and some proactive controls for logging analytics. That will help a lot."
"Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could improve the user interface, and the experience of users receiving the reports and tracking could be better."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is ranked 8th in Log Management with 81 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer writes "We can automate event-based handling solutions, is stable, and is great for heavy traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.