We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Norton Security Premium [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."This is stable and scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiClient is dual authentication and the VPN is secure."
"The most valuable features are malware detection, integrates well with other solutions, and ease of use for all users."
"It works well and the performance is good."
"From an application perspective, this solution is stable."
"Compared to other similar solutions, it is faster in connecting."
"The ability to reroute traffic from the user, connecting you to the internet rather than passing through our network area, is very useful."
"The VPN connection is the feature that I like the most."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiClient are ease of use and simple configuration."
"We like how it can check for issues. That includes files and web browsers."
"With the heightened security around phishing, identity theft, and malware, this is a good product."
"The antivirus aspect of the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the quick installation."
"The product is called Norton 360 all-in-one. It is a full product."
"The dashboard is good."
"Protects me from internet vulnerability."
"Security Premium's best features are blocking, notifications, and the user interface."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"Detections could be improved."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"We've had some problems with having to remove the current version and either reinstalling an old version or updating to the new one."
"Cloud services are very expensive for us."
"The solution requires skillful users."
"Sometimes there are issues when we are trying to connect."
"I would like to see endpoint detection and response included."
"The tool needs to improve its web filtering feature. Its support quality needs improvement. We speak different languages, and this can create misunderstandings."
"There is room for improvement by increasing the solution's knowledge base."
"It would be interesting if the solution offered a way to try to investigate and create a use case to trace vectors."
"Sometimes the program is too complex."
"During scanning, sometimes, there is a heavy load on the workstation. This needs to be improved."
"The only problem with Norton Antivirus is that it consumes a lot of resources like CPU and memory in the background. Whenever it's scanning, my laptop becomes very slow, and the worst part is you cannot do anything about it. As this product is secured by my local IT team, you cannot even kill that process, and that's what I've felt about many other antivirus solutions. I'm using McAfee for personal use, and I have the same problem."
"The product could always be more secure."
"The product is an antivirus, it should be updated automatically when needed."
"The solution can improve the security modules."
"It would be helpful for me if this solution works on our cloud backup data."
"Security Premium's cost could be lower."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews while Norton Security Premium [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Norton Security Premium [EOL] is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Norton Security Premium [EOL] writes "User-friendly solution with good blocking". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Norton Security Premium [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.