We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."
"It has a quick detection and response time."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"I don't currently see where the solution is lacking features. For us and for our clients it works very well and we're pleased with it."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
"Pricing is fine compared to other solutions."
As the digital attack surface expands, security teams must also expand their defense capabilities. Yet, adding additional security monitoring tools is not always the answer. Additional monitoring tools means more alerts for security teams to investigate, more context switching in the investigation process, and slower response times. This creates a number of challenges for security teams including alert fatigue, a lack of qualified security personnel to manage new tools, and slower response times.
Integrated into the Fortinet Security Fabric, FortiSOAR security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) remedies some of the biggest challenges facing cybersecurity teams today. Allowing security operation center (SOC) teams to create a custom automated framework that pulls together all of their organization's tools unifies operations, eliminating alert fatigue and reducing context switching. This allows enterprises to not only adapt, but also optimize their security process.
ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.
Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 11th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "Quick detection and response time, with helpful playbooks used to automate our response". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cisco SecureX, Splunk Phantom, IBM Resilient and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, IntSights and EclecticIQ.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.