Compare Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet FortiSOAR Logo
2,914 views|1,925 comparisons
ThreatQ Logo
1,337 views|956 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response.""It has a quick detection and response time."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"I don't currently see where the solution is lacking features. For us and for our clients it works very well and we're pleased with it.""The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is fine compared to other solutions."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a quick detection and response time.
Top Answer: Pricing is fine compared to other solutions.
Top Answer: The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors. For example, if you have customers who are using the CheckPoint firewall or Sophos firewall, and they are forwarding… more »
Top Answer: The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized… more »
Top Answer: I'm not sure if the solution is currently missing any features. I haven't noticed anything that could be added. The biggest challenge is the deployment. The installation of the ThreatQ only takes the… more »
Top Answer: Initially, the solution was assigned to just extract the reports we needed. We just integrated our threat feed URLs to the ThreatQ platform. We could create a report which was like a categorized… more »
Ranking
Views
2,914
Comparisons
1,925
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
391
Rating
7.0
Views
1,337
Comparisons
956
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberSponse, FortiSOAR
Learn More
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

As the digital attack surface expands, security teams must also expand their defense capabilities. Yet, adding additional security monitoring tools is not always the answer. Additional monitoring tools means more alerts for security teams to investigate, more context switching in the investigation process, and slower response times. This creates a number of challenges for security teams including alert fatigue, a lack of qualified security personnel to manage new tools, and slower response times.

Integrated into the Fortinet Security Fabric, FortiSOAR security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) remedies some of the biggest challenges facing cybersecurity teams today. Allowing security operation center (SOC) teams to create a custom automated framework that pulls together all of their organization's tools unifies operations, eliminating alert fatigue and reducing context switching. This allows enterprises to not only adapt, but also optimize their security process.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiSOAR
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider28%
Government7%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2021.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 11th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "Quick detection and response time, with helpful playbooks used to automate our response". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cisco SecureX, Splunk Phantom, IBM Resilient and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, IntSights and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.