Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] vs Symantec Proxy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
2,465 views|2,014 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] and Symantec Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is optimization.""The most valuable feature is connectivity."

More Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] Pros →

"It enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges.""We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.""The most valuable features of this solution are the URL database, malicious URLs, policies, and policy creation.""The initial setup of Symantec Proxy is easy.""Symantec Proxy’s technical support is very good.""The most valuable feature is the caching.""It is easy to use, and it is stable and scalable. You don't need a large team for deployment and maintenance.""The Symantec antivirus suite and the proxy component are the most valuable feature."

More Symantec Proxy Pros →

Cons
"From a security perspective, FortiWAN needs to be improved.""Having more documentation would be helpful."

More Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] Cons →

"Improvements in log availability would greatly enhance its overall effectiveness.""The platform's pricing needs improvement.""The traffic filtering could improve. Our firewall traffic is limited. Additionally, it would be helpful if there was a dashboard and reporting feature.""The initial setup is actually quite complex to install because our users don't have admin rights on the boxes and there's no remote install option by an administrator.""Support response time and case resolution could be improved.""The user interface could be improved, and the price could be lower as well.""The solution is quite complex.""Prior to the Broadcom purchase, every appliance was application based, but now they have one ISG device and on top of it multiple applications are running. It has a single point of failure. If your device goes down, all of the applications would be down."

More Symantec Proxy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of cost, it is expensive. Its pricing has been a challenge for us since its acquisition by Broadcom."
  • "It's expensive. Clients often go to other products."
  • "Licensing is based on a subscription."
  • "The price is too expensive compared with that of another solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees required."
  • "There is a license needed to use Symantec Proxy."
  • "Our cost was based on a three-year upfront CapEx contract."
  • "Symantec Proxy has different expiry dates and renewal dates, which is a problem, so Broadcom should improve the licensing renewal process for the solution."
  • More Symantec Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.
    Top Answer:The product is highly priced. There are no additional costs apart from the standard licenses.
    Top Answer:The platform's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    14th
    Views
    2,465
    Comparisons
    2,014
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    435
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Blue Coat Encrypted Traffic Management, ProxySG Appliance
    Learn More
    Overview

    FortiWAN intelligently balances Internet and intranet traffic across multiple WAN connections to lower bandwidth costs and keep users connected. It offers easy-to-use multi-WAN management and a flexible policy-based performance management system.

    Symantec Proxy is designed to provide web security, web access control, and secure web gateway functionalities for organizations. It helps protect against web-based threats, enforce web usage policies, and provide secure access to internet resources.

    Symantec Proxy Benefits:

    • Easy to use
    • Comprehensive security features
    • Ability to block malicious websites and applications
    • Efficient management of network traffic
    • Scalable and compatible with various operating systems and devices
    • Highly rated customer support and technical assistance

    Symantec Proxy Features:

    • Web Filtering: Symantec Proxy offers web filtering capabilities to control and manage web access based on predefined categories or custom policies.
      1. Malware Protection: The solution incorporates malware detection and prevention mechanisms to identify and block web-based threats, such as malware, viruses, and phishing attacks. 
      2. URL Filtering: Symantec Proxy uses URL filtering to categorize and assess the reputation of web domains and URLs in real-time. 
      3. SSL/TLS Inspection: The proxy solution supports SSL/TLS decryption and inspection to examine encrypted web traffic for potential threats or policy violations. 
      4. Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Symantec Proxy may include data loss prevention capabilities to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive data through web channels. 
      5. User Authentication and Access Control: The solution supports user authentication and access control mechanisms to enforce user-based policies and provide secure internet access.
      6. Reporting and Analytics: Symantec Proxy provides reporting and analytics capabilities to monitor web usage, user activities, security events, and compliance violations.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Symantec Proxy users. 

      PeerSpot user, Consultant at a financial services firm, says that Symantec Proxy "...enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges."

      PeerSpot user, General Manager & founder at a engineering company, writes that Symantec Proxy has "A complex deployment, no proper user reporting, and a proxy component that works."

      Muhammad Salahuddin, Unit Head - Network and Security Solutions at FPM Solutions, states that Symantec Proxy has "Good URL filtering but is expensive and doesn't have good technical support services."

        Sample Customers
        Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
        Jefferies
        Top Industries
        No Data Available
        REVIEWERS
        Financial Services Firm42%
        Comms Service Provider17%
        Government8%
        Marketing Services Firm8%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company16%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Manufacturing Company11%
        Government7%
        Company Size
        No Data Available
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business33%
        Midsize Enterprise11%
        Large Enterprise56%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business17%
        Midsize Enterprise17%
        Large Enterprise67%
        Buyer's Guide
        WAN Optimization
        April 2024
        Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: April 2024.
        770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

        Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Symantec Proxy is ranked 14th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 18 reviews. Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Symantec Proxy is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] writes "Easy to deploy with good connectivity and robustness for managing WAN links". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Proxy writes "A user-friendly solution with good technical support". Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Proxy is most compared with Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, Skyhigh Security, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, Zscaler Internet Access and McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Service.

        We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.