• Home
  • FraudNet vs. SAS Fraud Management

FraudNet vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Experian Logo
FraudNet
238 views|202 comparisons
SAS Logo
SAS Fraud Management
Read 2 SAS Fraud Management reviews
1,185 views|656 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FraudNet and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use FraudNet?
-Amit Kumar
Monitor multiple channels with a single platform
In the past, our clients had to pay a lot of money for each and every department. Now they can just pay for a single centralized system with SAS.... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."

    • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    27th
    out of 65 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    238
    Comparisons
    202
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    out of 65 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    1,185
    Comparisons
    656
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Experian
    SAS
    Overview
    Fraud detection software that identifies fraudulent accounts, searches for customer information & provides warning of account takeover.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Nets
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FraudNet is ranked 27th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. FraudNet is rated 0.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". FraudNet is most compared with Experian Crosscore, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.