We performed a comparison between Fungible Storage Cluster and VAST Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."Redundancy and the fault tolerance of the platform are the most impressive."
"The predictive performance analytics are good."
"As soon as we introduced our first Pure Storage FlashArray, the first benefit was at least twice the performance increase. Our production databases simply ran twice as fast with no other change."
"The code upgrades are very smooth."
"The most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray are simplicity, ease of use, and dashboard management."
"The most valuable features are extremely low latency, high IOPS with VMware, inline deduplication and compression."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most comfortable pricing, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The product cheaper compared to other solutions concerning the technology that they are using."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to implement and configure, easy to use, and really reliable."
"The solution is useful for machine learning and scientific applications, including computer simulations."
"This has been one of the most reliable storage systems that I have ever used."
"If they could make it cheaper, that would be something."
"Pure Storage FlashArray could improve some aspects. There are certain features that are good and there are some features that I see some issues with at the technical level. Those issues are related to replication. They need to resolve those issues, which I have already highlighted to the Pure team. Additionally, there are some issues in the active cluster that could improve."
"I recognize it's a difficult challenge, but I would like to see them make the pricing more reasonable."
"I would like to see more detailed reporting on the data. However, it would be nice to know what are the exact VMs usage after deduplication and/or what that VMs actual latency and bandwidth is, outside of VMware."
"In some cases, we get into very in-depth conversations around movement of specific data and, what's more, chunk sizes. The documentation lacked any description or information on that."
"I would like to see more cloud integration."
"Pure Storage FlashArray could improve the recent file storage capabilities because it is lacking a lot of features."
"Historical analytics would be useful. At the moment, they don't have any type of application built for historical analytics."
"The security and reporting could be improved."
"The write performance could be improved because it is less than half of the read performance."
"The read/write ratio is an area in the solution with some flaws and needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Fungible Storage Cluster is ranked 33rd in All-Flash Storage while VAST Data is ranked 18th in All-Flash Storage with 2 reviews. Fungible Storage Cluster is rated 7.0, while VAST Data is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Fungible Storage Cluster writes "Easy to implement and configure but the security and reporting could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VAST Data writes "Stability-wise, a device that has been up and running for years". Fungible Storage Cluster is most compared with , whereas VAST Data is most compared with Pure Storage FlashBlade, NetApp AFF, Qumulo, Dell PowerScale (Isilon) and DDN SFA7990X.
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors and best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.