Fusion Framework System vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fusion Framework System and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Here are some of the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream for Operational Resilience and Business Continuity Fusion Risk Management Pros: Fusion Risk Management is an… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
31st
out of 86 in GRC
Views
312
Comparisons
148
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
351
Comparisons
181
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Accelus
Learn More
Overview

Fusion helps your company prepare, manage, and act in any situation with our unique combination of consulting services and software solutions, including our award-winning software, the Fusion Framework System.

The Fusion Framework creates tailored and engaging experiences for all contributors, automates much of the administration workload, and establishes an information foundation that can be used to make better decisions. Check out how Fusion can redefine your business continuity, disaster recovery, and risk management programs.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Aureon, ETS, Discount Tire, Box,
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization40%
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company8%
Healthcare Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fusion Framework System is ranked 31st in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. Fusion Framework System is rated 0.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fusion Framework System is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent and RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.