Galen Framework vs Wikidi Testomato comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galen Framework Logo
249 views|102 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Wikidi Logo
81 views|65 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galen Framework and Wikidi Testomato based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Hashk Test
Use Wikidi Testomato?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature.
Top Answer:Galen Framework does not have any additional costs after the product is purchased.
Top Answer:I haven't found any specific areas for modernization or improvement in Galen Framework yet. However, one observation I have made is about the auto-generation of Galen files. While this feature exists… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
25th
Views
249
Comparisons
102
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
376
Rating
8.0
43rd
Views
81
Comparisons
65
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Testomato
Learn More
Galen Framework
Video Not Available
Wikidi
Video Not Available
Overview

Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.

Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.

Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.

Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Healthcare Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Galen Framework is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Wikidi Testomato is ranked 43rd in Functional Testing Tools. Galen Framework is rated 8.6, while Wikidi Testomato is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". On the other hand, Galen Framework is most compared with , whereas Wikidi Testomato is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.