We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."
"I use the solution for website management."
"We use the tool to store codes."
"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"The implementation is easy."
"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
"Git removed the credential feature."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
