We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The setup process is pretty simple."
"We use the tool to store codes."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"The solution could improve by having more customization."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Git is most compared with Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM, Helix Core and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.