Goda Case SPEC vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Goda Case SPEC and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ranking
Views
45
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
100
Comparisons
77
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Case SPEC, Analyst Pro
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
Goda
Video Not Available
Overview
Advanced requirements, test cases and life cycle management software. Items (requirements, test scripts, etc.) can be arranged in multilevel hierarchies and linked in any arbitrary fashion to other items, files (documents, code fragments etc) or diagrams. Full graphical and tabular traceability is provided with drill-down to lower levels. A change in an object such as a User Requirement automatically flags directly and indirectly linked objects such as test steps as suspect, to be re-evaluated.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Sample Customers
Cytonome Inc, Accenture, Cherokee Information Services, The Arborsys Group
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Goda Case SPEC is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. Goda Case SPEC is rated 0.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Goda Case SPEC is most compared with , whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.