We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Better pricing would be helpful."
"Its price is fine."
"It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
"The solution is free."
"They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
"I pay a yearly subscription fee."
Earn 20 points
Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage. Google created three simple product options to help you address the needs of your applications while keeping your costs low. These three product options use the same API, providing you with a simple and consistent method of access.
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 6th in Cloud Storage with 14 reviews while SpiderOak is ranked 14th in Cloud Storage. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while SpiderOak is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Easy to use and scalable with excellent technical support". On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Amazon S3, Huawei FusionStorage and Microsoft Azure File Storage, whereas SpiderOak is most compared with Tresorit, Dropbox and Box.
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.