We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and Mirantis Container Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has valuable security features. It can connect with multiple DevOps tools."
"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable feature is container deployment."
"The deployment of the cluster is very easy."
"The scalability is the best feature."
"Google Kubernetes Engine is used for orchestrating Docker containers. We have 30 or 40 customers working with this solution now. We'll probably see 10 to 15 percent growth in the number of customers using Google Kubernetes Engine in the future."
"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."
"It is easy to use and deploy."
"The solution is available across AWS, GCP and Azure and is seamless."
"Main products are portable."
"If we compare legacy application support to Docker, it's a superior product."
"The solution containerizes software."
"It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"The UI is very useful."
"There is room for improvement in the cluster updates process. Specifically, when managing both non-production and production clusters, we need a sequential functionality."
"There are some security issues, but it might just be because we are not up to speed yet as much as we should be and so we haven't found it in the documentation yet. That's why I don't want to confuse this. Still, it could be a little bit easier to understand and implement."
"Google Kubernetes Engine is less stable in some highly complex deployments with many nodes."
"The network configuration has to be simplified."
"An area in which Google Kubernetes Engine could improve is configuration."
"The tool's configuration features need improvement."
"I think that security is an important point, and there should be additional features for the evaluation of data in containers that will create a more secure environment for usage in multi-parent models."
"The user interface could be improved."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
"Mirantis Container Cloud needs to improve its documentation."
"I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions."
"The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs."
"There are a couple of things. Firstly, the vaultStore database within Container isn't as efficient as a standalone Container vault. This needs improvement."
"I feel that the product lacks to offer a proper health status of the images which are running, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 9th in Container Management with 32 reviews while Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 1st in Container Virtualization with 29 reviews. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Linode, Kubernetes, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Rancher Labs and OpenShift Container Platform, whereas Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher and Snyk. See our Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Mirantis Container Cloud report.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
