Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports.""We find the solution to be stable.""I like the monitoring feature.""The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use.""It's easy to use.""The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS.""Provides visibility into the performance uptime.""Google's technical support is very good."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pros →

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.""Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana.""If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver.""Lacking sufficient operations documentation.""It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost.""While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace.""It could be more stable.""The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient.""The logging functionality could be better."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Cons →

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications.""The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."
  • "The cost could be lower."
  • "We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."
  • More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It could be even more automated. For instance, the moment you deploy something, the monitoring can be there for everything. You will just have to launch or click the console in the morning, and then… more »
    Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
    Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,836
    Comparisons
    3,436
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    274
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    256
    Comparisons
    102
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring
    Serverless360
    Learn More
    Kovai.co
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Real-time log management and analysis

    Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

    Built-in metrics observability at scale

    Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

    Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

    Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

    Monitor and improve your application's performance

    Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

    Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

    Our Core features:

    1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
    2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
    3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
    4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
    5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
      Sample Customers
      Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games
      MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Comms Service Provider29%
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Energy/Utilities Company14%
      Manufacturing Company14%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm18%
      Computer Software Company15%
      Manufacturing Company9%
      Comms Service Provider7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company39%
      Manufacturing Company16%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Insurance Company5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business20%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise70%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise70%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise9%
      Large Enterprise56%
      Buyer's Guide
      Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is ranked 27th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 41st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is rated 7.8, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) writes "Good logging and tracing but does need more profiling capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Azure Monitor, Amazon CloudWatch and Grafana, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

      See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

      We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.