Compare Graylog vs. LogDNA

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 5 Devo reviews.
6,005 views|3,097 comparisons
Graylog Logo
17,993 views|14,463 comparisons
LogDNA Logo
725 views|634 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. LogDNA and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,775 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.""The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.""One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.""Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.""The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.""The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

More Devo Pros »

"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is.""Open source and user friendly."

More Graylog Pros »

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface.""LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

More LogDNA Pros »

Cons
"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.""The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.""There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.""There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. The breadth of overall log parsers that exists right now is an area that they could improve. Natively, there's more that could be done by Devo then what it can and can't understand from a parsing perspective.""Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

More Devo Cons »

"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second.""Lacks sufficient documentation."

More Graylog Cons »

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team.""Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

More LogDNA Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I use the free version of Graylog."

More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
448,775 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of… more »
Top Answer: We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the… more »
Top Answer: There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the… more »
Top Answer: Open source and user friendly.
Top Answer: It would be helpful if they would work more on the documentation because it's not very clear and ideally I'd like to be… more »
Top Answer: I use this solution regularly for analyzing incidents, collecting them to figure out what's going on. For now, I'm using… more »
Top Answer: The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface.
Top Answer: Scalability could be improved. We are using it through the IBM cloud deployment and on some of the data centers that are… more »
Top Answer: In terms of primary use case, LogDNA is our root cause analysis for on-call channels and we're now also using it for… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustGraylog2
Learn
Devo
Graylog
LogDNA
Overview

Devo, the cloud-native logging and security analytics company, empowers security and operations teams to maximize the value of all their data. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

  • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
  • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
  • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
  • Lower cost than alternatives.
  • Full-scale customer service.
  • No expensive training or tool experts required.

LogDNA is a powerful, multi-cloud log management system that aggregates all system, server, and application logs into one modernized platform. Centralize, monitor, store, tail, and analyze logs in real-time with one simple command-line or web interface. Setup takes just 1-2 minutes. Deploy as a cloud SaaS solution, on-premises using your own infrastructure, or as a hybrid solution. Empower your engineers with the exact logging solutions they need so they can focus on what they do best - create quality products.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about Graylog
Learn more about LogDNA
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenTextBlue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-AgenturInstacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Media Company8%
Comms Service Provider6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. LogDNA and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,775 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Graylog is ranked 14th in Log Management with 2 reviews while LogDNA is ranked 15th in Log Management with 2 reviews. Graylog is rated 8.6, while LogDNA is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Graylog writes "Captures our financial logs and preserves them and it covers many environments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogDNA writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". Graylog is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, whereas LogDNA is most compared with ELK Logstash, Splunk, IBM QRadar, Google Stackdriver and Rapid7 InsightOps. See our Graylog vs. LogDNA report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.