Compare HAProxy vs. Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager

HAProxy is ranked 5th in Application Delivery Controllers with 2 reviews while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review. HAProxy is rated 9.6, while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HAProxy writes "A containerized solution for TCP load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". HAProxy is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, NGINX Plus, Citrix ADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and A10 Networks Lightning ADC, whereas Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with Citrix ADC, NGINX Plus, Kemp LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP and Fortinet FortiADC .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: June 2020.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It solves a problem for me where I can build files, not based on the health of the check, but rather the speed of the check.

More HAProxy Pros »

The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes.

More Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager Pros »

Cons
The logging functionality could use improvement, as it is a little cryptic.

More HAProxy Cons »

In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else.

More Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial.

More HAProxy Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
17,128
Comparisons
12,295
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
279
Avg. Rating
9.5
Views
474
Comparisons
349
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
399
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE
Learn
HAProxy
Video Not Available
Pulse Secure
Overview

HAProxy is the most widely used software load balancer and application delivery controller in the world. The core HAProxy application delivery engine is an open source project chiefly maintained by HAProxy Technologies and assisted by a thriving open source community. HAProxy Community Edition is available for free at haproxy.org. HAProxy Enterprise Edition is packaged with additional enterprise class features, services and premium support from HAProxy Technologies.

Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

Offer
Learn more about HAProxy
Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Sample Customers
Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, YelpAlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper Networks
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Marketing Services Firm22%
Retailer22%
Media Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise55%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: June 2020.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.