Compare HeadSpin vs. IBM Rational Functional Tester

HeadSpin is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. HeadSpin is rated 8.0, while IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HeadSpin writes "The first connected intelligence platform that is easy to use for testing mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". HeadSpin is most compared with Perfecto Mobile, BrowserStack and Sauce Labs, whereas IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and SmartBear TestComplete.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform.

Read more »

It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.The most valuable feature is the UI component tester.

Read more »

Cons
Support and pricing could be improved.

Read more »

If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility.As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.

Read more »

Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
Views
789
Comparisons
616
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
663
Avg. Rating
8.0
22nd
Views
2,392
Comparisons
1,760
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn
HeadSpin
IBM
Overview

HeadSpin is the world’s first Connected Intelligence Platform™ that provides Web, Mobile, IoT, and 5G solutions to unify testing, monitoring, and analytics across applications, devices, and networks. HeadSpin empowers development, QA, operations, and network teams to optimize connected experiences and ensure digital business success.

IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
Offer
Learn more about HeadSpin
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Sample Customers
Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, TelstraEdumate
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company64%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Transportation Company13%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.