HighQ vs Polycom ContentConnect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HighQ Logo
129 views|108 comparisons
Poly Logo
37 views|26 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HighQ and Polycom ContentConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
129
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
37
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ContentConnect
Learn More
Overview

HighQ Dataroom is established as a global data room solution with transactions completed in the legal, banking and corporate sectors. The data room solutions include: Single use data room- individual premium data rooms that come with 24/7 project management as standard. Multi use data room- Multi use data rooms can be reused without the additional set-up cost. Enterprise data room- No storage limit and no project management.

Polycom ContentConnect solution delivers native content sharing experience between Skype for Business and non-Skype for Business environments for highly collaborative video meeting experience shared among disparate devices and networks. The ContentConnect is a virtual server application and a critical component of the Polycom RealConnect for Skype for Business solution as it handles contents shared across Skype for Business users and traditional videoconference systems. This innovative approach makes the whole video collaboration experience easy and consistent, which drives user adoption.

Sample Customers
Addleshaw Goddard, Allen & Overy, Maples, Hill Dickinson, Linklaters
7-Eleven, Abbotsleigh School, Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce & Sectoral Associations, Agricultural Bank of China, ALAIN AFFLELOU, Align Technology, America University of Kuwait, Anders Andersens Rengoring, Andong Medical Center, AOL, Arbitration Courts of Russian Federation, Arcor, Associação Pró-Vida, Astellas Pharmaceutical, Auburn University, Auchan France, Auchan Poland, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge Hospital, Banco PINE, Baptist Health, Beacon Communities, Bene, Beth Melsky Casting and Envision, Bilfinger Berger Hochbau,, BMC Software, Boretti, Buhler Group, Buro Happold, Buskerud (Oslo Fjord Alliance), Camp Quality, Canterbury and West Coast District Health Board, CARE Ratings, CEANNE, CEMIG
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HighQ is ranked 19th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Polycom ContentConnect is ranked 32nd in Content Collaboration Platforms. HighQ is rated 0.0, while Polycom ContentConnect is rated 0.0. On the other hand, HighQ is most compared with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server, whereas Polycom ContentConnect is most compared with .

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.