Compare Hitachi Content Platform vs. StackPath Object Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data.
Top Answer: They should improve the user interface. It's a little bit complex. It does not have a self-learning method. You need to know how to use it before you touch the system. The user interface is not… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case is mainly for backup archival and for sharing Dropbox files. It's a Dropbox kind of thing for sharing and archival. We also use it to create content.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
6th
Views
1,561
Comparisons
1,152
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
576
Avg. Rating
9.0
19th
Views
117
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Also Known As
HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
Learn
Hitachi
StackPath
Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

Why use StackPath Object Storage?
Frequent (hot) storage shouldn’t cost a lot. And once you’re paying for storage, we don’t believe you should pay AGAIN to access it. Welcome to StackPath’s Object Storage.

Save Money
50% cheaper than Amazon S3 or similar cloud storage providers.

No Data Transfer Fees
No charges for data transfer (egress) or API requests/calls.

High Performance
Better performance than cloud storage providers, even more so once paired with StackPath’s CDN or Edge Computing.

Performance
StackPath’s system architecture enables an average 6x faster performance relative to Cloud Storage Providers*. Especially when paired with our CDN or Edge Compute, this performance advantage means significantly faster time-to-first-byte speeds.

S3-Compatible
100% AWS S3 bit-compatible (same AWS API constructs for storage & identity management). No need to change your S3-compatible application.

Superior TTFB
Average time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance of less than 15 ms; made even faster when paired with our CDN. This is significantly lower than others’ TTFB.

Immediate Read Capability
When you write an object to our buckets, it can be read immediately after. This is not always the case with Amazon S3 — a well-known issue for AWS developers.

Offer
Learn more about Hitachi Content Platform
Learn more about StackPath Object Storage
Sample Customers
Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hitachi Content Platform is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 3 reviews while StackPath Object Storage is ranked 19th in File and Object Storage. Hitachi Content Platform is rated 9.0, while StackPath Object Storage is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Content Platform writes "Has valuable retention logs and the DNS is managed by itself ". On the other hand, Hitachi Content Platform is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp StorageGRID, Scality RING8 and IBM Cloud Object Storage, whereas StackPath Object Storage is most compared with MinIO, IBM Cloud Object Storage and Linode Object Storage.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.