HPE Apollo vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,611 views|2,765 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
3,112 views|2,286 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Apollo and Oracle SPARC Servers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rack Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Apollo vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"we can use the same platform for several use cases: Hadoop, Ceph, and we are considering the server for another use case right now. It's a single solution, we only have to integrate it once and we can use it for several technologies.""When we moved to the Apollo and all flash drives, we gained a lot of performance.""HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.""We usually use three blades for two-rack units, and with enough storage, it's really a small system with a powerful CPU, powerful hard drives, powerful disks.""HPE Apollo's most valuable feature is the ability to expand our storage capacity.""The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience.""Apollo Systems provide stuff that standard services do not. More HTDs, more compute power, at very reasonable pricing.""It's very reliable. I haven't had a single failure at all in the year and a half; not the slightest problem with it."

More HPE Apollo Pros →

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.""The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible.""The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization.""Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature.""I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU.""The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used.""The performance is the best feature."

More Oracle SPARC Servers Pros →

Cons
"Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall.""The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience.""The support from HPE Apollo could be better, they are making knowledgeable.""If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo.""What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security.""The predictive analysis feature could be improved.""HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved.""One drawback which I had: When I needed to expand storage on the Apollo, I had significant problems getting disks for it. It was a very long wait-time. So, if I were to give any advice in regards to improving this product, I would say make more of the 8TB disks available quicker."

More HPE Apollo Cons →

"I would like to see a reduced price point.""Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform.""The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system.""They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models.""They have declared the end of life of the hardware.""Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux.""Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

More Oracle SPARC Servers Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."
  • "The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."
  • "There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."
  • "It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."
  • "Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."
  • More HPE Apollo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."
  • "The licensing is flexible."
  • "The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."
  • "The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."
  • "My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."
  • More Oracle SPARC Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.
    Top Answer:HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a particular product that is under warranty.
    Top Answer:We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.
    Top Answer:My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution. My company's clients, who have paid for the licensing costs attached to the solution, have also engaged with some… more »
    Top Answer:Oracle products are usually fine-tuned with the software of other Oracle products, like Oracle WebLogic Server Services, Oracle Database, and Oracle Core Banking Software and Solutions, as all the… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Views
    3,611
    Comparisons
    2,765
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.5
    7th
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Views
    3,112
    Comparisons
    2,286
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo
    Learn More
    Overview

    The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

    Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

    Sample Customers
    Weta Digital
    University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE Apollo vs. Oracle SPARC Servers
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Apollo vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Apollo is ranked 6th in Rack Servers with 22 reviews while Oracle SPARC Servers is ranked 7th in Rack Servers with 7 reviews. HPE Apollo is rated 8.4, while Oracle SPARC Servers is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Apollo writes "An affordable and easy-to-implement solution, but its after-sales support and technical support should be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SPARC Servers writes "A rock-solid OS and rich virtualization features for hosting many VMs on one box". HPE Apollo is most compared with HPE ProLiant DL Servers, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge FX and Cray CS-Storm, whereas Oracle SPARC Servers is most compared with IBM Power Systems, Intel Server System, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Dell PowerEdge FX. See our HPE Apollo vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

    See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.