• Home
  • HPE BladeSystem vs. Oracle Sun 6048

HPE BladeSystem vs Oracle Sun 6048 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo

HPE BladeSystem

Read 134 HPE BladeSystem reviews
3,782 views|2,784 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo

Oracle Sun 6048

115 views|101 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Oracle Sun 6048 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Marziyeh Bahrami
A solution with an excellent and user-friendly interface and dashboard
There are limitations in writing exploiter features because of the sanctions.
Use Oracle Sun 6048?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."

    • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Read all 39 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive.
    Read all 28 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,782
    Comparisons
    2,784
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.9
    16th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    115
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Sun 6048
    Learn More
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    Oracle
    Overview
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

    Oracle's Sun Blade 6048 Chassis helps you overcome the challenges causing pressure to your superscale HPC project:

    • The move to multicore processors is driving increasingly larger node sizes.
    • The ceiling of power and cooling resources.
    • The growing complexity of management.
    • The ongoing needs for expansion, repairs, and upgrades.

    As the foundation of the Sun Blade 6048 modular system, this chassis is designed to support the latest I/O technologies and the most advanced rack-level cooling solutions. 

    Sample Customers
    EMIS Health
    Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Hªttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH, Mutlinet Pakistan
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while Oracle Sun 6048 is ranked 16th in Blade Servers. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while Oracle Sun 6048 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X, whereas Oracle Sun 6048 is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.