Compare HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 14 reviews while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 48 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.4, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives us good server density and a harmonized hardware solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "We have gained some efficiencies on the provisioning front-end side, but there have been challenges with external integrations to other platforms". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Superdome X, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HPE BladeSystem Logo
6,518 views|4,244 comparisons
HPE Synergy Logo
11,995 views|7,311 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
With just one cable, for redundancy let's say two, you can feed sixteen servers in a single c7000 chassis.The virtual connect and network management port is a valuable feature.The benefit is the density and the capability for global harmonization on the hardware, because all the hardware chassis are the same. We can also purchase the same network cards too, chassis by chassis, so it gives us a global solution.They have served different needs for us from virtualized web servers to dedicated databases and application servers.They are reliable, and it's relatively easy to manage them. They also regularly provide patching for the servers.I really appreciate the integrated Onboard Administrator, the iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) modular network, and the SAN Switches.Virtual Fabric and interconnects are easy to configure and maintain.Wide choice in mixing SAN and LAN.

Read more »

The Online firmware update for the virtual connects has minimized our downtime windows.The most valuable features of this solution are the ease of management and the integration with OneView.Where it used to take one week to re-image or upgrade our hosts, it can now take one day.We have more control over the firmware and how we are managing our physical servers.It has had a positive effect on the efficiency of our IT infrastructure team. The manageability of it is so easy, we're able to install it quickly, and replacement parts are easy to get in and out quickly.Cable management is a big feature, in addition to time to deployment. We can buy a new server and have it up and running very quickly.Valuable features include its dependability, reliability, and the ease of managing the system.With OneView, we can take care of all our servers in one dashboard.

Read more »

Cons
The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture.HPE BladeSystems is an old technology that cannot fit all of the dynamic organizational needs of our company.The scalability is limited because you only have a 16-server by chassis.There have been some hardware failures with them. These failures have since been solved by HPE support partners.The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic.This product needs a wider range of firmware compatibility matrix from the oldest to the newest blade server.​Storage capacity could be enhanced.Higher bandwidth interconnects could be introduced.

Read more »

Technical support for this solution has a very good initial response; however, escalation takes time, and most of the time the first level of support cannot solve your case.A faster Composer module would be a good inclusion for the next release of this solution.The installation and initial setup process is complex and needs to be improved.I would be more comfortable if Ansible actually rolled back the data used for automating platforms. If it could be communicated to the upstream Ansible, I wouldn't need to go back and forth and validate the libraries as we upgrade the Ansible version.I would like to see more nodes in a single chassis so we wouldn't have to purchase additional chassis.I would really like a way to validate the firmware in my specific environment before trying to deploy it. Those were the issues we had early on with firmware upgrades, particularly around certificates. All in all, having some level of confidence aside from it just having been tested generically would help. Something more specific to my environment would be very helpful.One of the features I want to see, which I will see with OneView 5.0, is to have all the OneView consoles in a single pane of glass. That will make it easy to see everything in one place and not have to log in to multiple consoles.We haven't seen any ROI, and it hasn't reduced our cost of operations.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000.​The price could be cheaper.

Read more »

We pay for licensing on the fibre channel uplinks, on the Virtual Connect, which is an add-on.The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs by 50 percent.It costs us around $60,000 a year.The licensing is more around the software for RGS, because we are deploying bare metal installs. It is mainly the operating system and any lights-out management. So, licensing is minimum. We are licensing it annually.When we made the purchase of the hardware, we added Professional Services to it.Nutanix was really hard to implement, and it was very pricey compared to what we get from Synergy.We do CAPEX.For temporal use, when you throw on the fact that you're essentially doubling your capacity, right there you could claim a 50 percent TCO reduction.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
6,518
Comparisons
4,244
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
8.4
1st
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
11,995
Comparisons
7,311
Reviews
47
Average Words per Review
746
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 82% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview
HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

Offer
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Learn more about HPE Synergy
Sample Customers
EMIS HealthHudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Manufacturing Company19%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm10%
University7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise70%
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise80%
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email