We performed a comparison between OpenText Content Manager and Veritas Enterprise Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two File Archiving solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."
"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."
"I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good."
"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."
"The product can be integrated with different solutions."
"It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."
"Organizations can streamline governance processes and improve compliance by utilizing automated classification to tag and categorize data."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and performance. However, the performance can depend on the workload being used."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault is an archive solution for email and files."
"The indexing and searching features are the most valuable features of Veritas Enterprise Vault."
"I use the solution to find data loss and restore the data."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault is highly stable and has low-maintenance."
"Enterprise is a user-friendly product."
"We use the solution to archive emails."
"The product could improve its scalability."
"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."
"The ease of use should be addressed."
"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."
"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made."
"Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault's cloud backup solution should include the journal archiving feature along with the standard licensing package."
"I cannot perform application backup, and I am not able to repair the license."
"The stability could be improved."
"The integration needs to improve."
"The file-level archiving is very important in Enterprise Vault 12 and this doesn't really exist in early versions."
"Cost is high for Veritas Enterprise Vault."
"The platform's price could be affordable for small businesses."
"The product is a very complicated solution. It is not easy to upgrade and get alerts of issues. You have to check it all the time to see if there is an internal error."
OpenText Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 21 reviews while Veritas Enterprise Vault is ranked 1st in File Archiving with 13 reviews. OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6, while Veritas Enterprise Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas Enterprise Vault writes " A solution with a user-friendly console that can be used for email and mailbox archiving". OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management, whereas Veritas Enterprise Vault is most compared with Commvault Cloud, Microsoft Exchange and Barracuda Email Protection. See our OpenText Content Manager vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault report.
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.
We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
