We performed a comparison between HPE ConvergedSystem and Vblock [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure."Most of the HP products I come across are they are easy to install. That's not very complex."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines."
"Consolidation and duplications features."
"We use the solution for DDI."
"The storage, BladeSystems, Virtual Connect, and simplicity with hyper-converged solutions are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The tool's most valuable features are stability and scalability."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to restore lost machines. Essentially its high availability capabilities are extremely valuable to us."
"The user interface, reporting, and management are good, and we are quite happy with the performance."
"The high redundancy of components has minimized frequent service degradation/failure."
"UCS Manager worked well for net/blade management and has allowed fairly easy use of dedicated bare-metal blades."
"The most valuable features are reliability and high availability."
"We have seen measurable increases in our system performance. Those increases have been directly measurable in application performance and the delivery of critical business information to our users."
"Systems run solidly."
"Capability for scale and growth within a single rack brings strong possibilities for capacity planning."
"VMware NSX: Provides the ability for our organisation to deliver true DR."
"The most valuable feature is that it is centrally managed, as it is quite easy for our customers to manage everything, end-to-end."
"HPE ConvergedSystem needs to improve its price."
"I would like to see monitoring solutions included, as well as brand support."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The MTG inside HP could be improved."
"The solution has a complicated front-end."
"The solution needs to add NFS features."
"The interface is not fully integrated with the ESXi, which is something that could be improved."
"It could be enhanced by improving the built-in backup solution."
"The implementation and support could be better."
"RCM upgrades are painful."
"Troublesome relationships with VCE at the beginning of our use came undone quickly after we went live."
"In the next release, I would like to see a smaller footprint in the data center and have improvements to disk performance."
"The user control could be more advanced. They should work to improve this in future releases."
"Tighter alignment could simplify and speed up the configuration and delivery process."
"VCE tools, like Vision or AMP were not stand alone, and depended too much on other management consoles."
"The integration with other vendors' products needs to be looked at. It's not as flexible as we would like it to be."
Earn 20 points
HPE ConvergedSystem is ranked 3rd in Converged Infrastructure with 21 reviews while Vblock [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Converged Infrastructure. HPE ConvergedSystem is rated 8.4, while Vblock [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE ConvergedSystem writes "With good integration and expansion capabilities, the tool also offers good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vblock [EOL] writes "The VCE VBlocks came along and it was the best combination of an all-in-one virtual data center in a box Converged SAN, Network, and Compute that used VMware to drive the whole package". HPE ConvergedSystem is most compared with Dell PowerEdge VRTX, Oracle Private Cloud Appliance, Dell VxBlock System and FlexPod XCS, whereas Vblock [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors and best Converged Infrastructure for SAP HANA vendors.
We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
