We performed a comparison between HPE EVA and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)."There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"It is very stable."
"To receive a performance enhancement by merely clicking the one button upgrade is the true value of the platform and what I look forward to the most."
"Acropolis AOS's networking concept is excellent."
"One of the most valuable features is that it can be applied at any scale."
"Nutanix Acropolis AOS is easy to use, integrates with other hardware configurations, and is simple to manage."
"It has been stable so far."
"Simplified management: It provides us more time to work on other tasks."
"The solution remains stable across versions."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its software Move, which we use to migrate virtual info from another platform to the Nutanix platform."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
"Compatible with third party hardware, but it's still very limited."
"The pricing of the solution is too high. It needs to be adjusted or lowered to be more competitive."
"The product could be improved with more security. The product needs a bit more experience in the market. I think you don't have the possibility to add other hardware. It could be improved with the ability to add and extend."
"NCI's pricing is expensive."
"In the next release of this solution, they could improve by being more competitive with VMware. I would like all third-party solutions to work well with Nutanix Acropolis AOS."
"I would like to see more Kubernetes and container-related workflows and multiple cloud-partner management. I would also like to see how they will synergize all these AI/ML functionalities that are available on other platforms."
"The product requires a lot of resources."
"One of the very important things that I would like to see in Nutanix, but I'm not sure if it's in the roadmap or not, is to have some kind of caching optimization at remote sites, to build active-active data centers more easily."
More Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is ranked 3rd in HCI with 194 reviews. HPE EVA is rated 8.6, while Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) writes "A powerful solution with easy deployment, upgrades, and management". HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA, whereas Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is most compared with VMware vSAN, VxRail, HPE SimpliVity, VMware vSphere and Hyper-V.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.