Compare IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM DataPower Gateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The API Connect gateway service and the SQL injection feature is good.""It's high-speed and it can be remotely administered via an API.""The solution is very easy to work with."

More IBM DataPower Gateway Pros »

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper.""The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism.""The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

More Zenoss Service Dynamics Pros »

Cons
"Scripting needs improvement. It's hard for our customers.""The components that they include in the product that are, in fact, a WTX, really need to be removed from the product because they tend to fail.""The solution requires a lot of training manuals in order to get to know it better and to be able to use it effectively."

More IBM DataPower Gateway Cons »

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex""The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement.""There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

More Zenoss Service Dynamics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

More Zenoss Service Dynamics Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The API Connect gateway service and the SQL injection feature is good.
Top Answer: If you want additional features, you will need to pay more.
Top Answer: Scripting needs improvement. It's hard for our customers.
Top Answer: They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper.
Top Answer: It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way.
Top Answer: There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative… more »
Ranking
Views
5,218
Comparisons
4,352
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
471
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
3,522
Comparisons
2,722
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
559
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere DataPower, IBM DataPower, IBM WebSphere DataPower
Learn
IBM
Zenoss
Overview

IBM DataPower Gateway is a single multi-channel gateway that helps provide security, control, integration and optimized access to a full range of mobile, web, application programming interface (API), service-oriented architecture (SOA), B2B and cloud workloads. It enables you to rapidly expand the scope of valuable IT assets to new channels - giving customers, employees and partners access to critical resources. It is available in the following form factors: physical, virtual, cloud, Linux and Docker.

Zenoss Service Dynamics (ZSD) is a hybrid IT monitoring platform that allows enterprise companies to monitor everything, including compute, storage, network, converged infrastructure, applications and unified communications systems. Zenoss customers gain IT performance and risk insights into their unique IT ecosystems through real-time analytics that adapt to today's constantly changing data centers and cloud infrastructures, enabling them to eliminate disruptions and accelerate business outcomes.

Offer
Learn more about IBM DataPower Gateway
Learn more about Zenoss Service Dynamics
Sample Customers
RBL Bank, Availity2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company9%
Construction Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM DataPower Gateway is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Zenoss Service Dynamics is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews. IBM DataPower Gateway is rated 7.4, while Zenoss Service Dynamics is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM DataPower Gateway writes "Deals with multiple protocols, but "WTX" components are problematic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zenoss Service Dynamics writes "Agentless monitoring means it uses the available, standard protocols, like TCP, UDP, WMI, and WinRM". IBM DataPower Gateway is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, Apigee, NGINX Plus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Zenoss Service Dynamics is most compared with Zabbix, ScienceLogic, Splunk, Dynatrace and PRTG Network Monitor. See our IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.