Compare IBM OpenPages vs. Nasdaq BWise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM OpenPages Logo
1,843 views|1,323 comparisons
Nasdaq BWise Logo
454 views|333 comparisons
Ranking
5th
out of 52 in GRC
Views
1,843
Comparisons
1,323
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
out of 52 in GRC
Views
454
Comparisons
333
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 74% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 71% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenPages
Learn
IBM
Nasdaq
Overview
Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

A robust platform of Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solutions. This platform is based on a solid foundation of process management, risk management and compliance expertise. Managing corporate responsibilities and obligations, as well as structuring enterprise risk management are all key aspects of the BWise GRC Platform.

Offer
Learn more about IBM OpenPages
Learn more about Nasdaq BWise
Sample Customers
Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Depā€¹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, UnumAegon, The Nielsen Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer7%
No Data Available

IBM OpenPages is ranked 5th in GRC while Nasdaq BWise is ranked 16th in GRC. IBM OpenPages is rated 0.0, while Nasdaq BWise is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream and SAP BusinessObjects GRC, whereas Nasdaq BWise is most compared with RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Governance vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.