Compare IBM PSS vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use IBM PSS? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PSS vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2021. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 52 Comparisons 27 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 3,522 Comparisons 2,291 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 479 Rating 8.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| PSS | EnCase eDiscovery |
Learn | |
| IBM | OpenText |
Overview | |
| IBM Atlas eDiscovery Process Management empowers attorneys, paralegals and discovery directors to manage rigorous, highly defensible legal workflows. |
eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review. With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM PSS | Learn more about OpenText EnCase eDiscovery |
Sample Customers | |
| LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA | Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Computer Software Company23% Comms Service Provider14% Government10% Financial Services Firm9% |
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PSS vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM PSS is ranked 29th in eDiscovery while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 3rd in eDiscovery with 2 reviews. IBM PSS is rated 0.0, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "It is used as a forensic tool and End point Security that takes an image, extracts the data and then analyzes the keyword search besides providing Security for the Enterprise network". IBM PSS is most compared with , whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with AccessData FTK, Nuix eDiscovery, Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery, Tanium and kCura Relativity.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.